Jump to content

User talk:Seimbru

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello Seimbru and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 16:42, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at PFC Ludogorets Razgrad shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Woody (talk) 15:20, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Woody I was editing the page by adding new content, fixing errors and correcting fallacies. GodCipherDivine is the one who kept reverting without a reason, more than the allowed 3 times. Why isn't he issued a warning about that then? I don't agree that this is justice. Seimbru (talk) 19:04, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (PFC Ludogorets Razgrad) for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:33, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: Heh. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've unblocked as the block no longer seems needed. Thanks for discussing, especially as the other editor did not. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:32, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]